COVID-19 calls for a Marshall Plan for health | The Hill

As we begin to appreciate the full weight of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are coming to realize that we are in the midst of interlocking crises.

First, we have been facing the direct effects of the virus on the physical and mental health of the public. Then, there are the economic consequences of the physical distancing measures we have taken to slow the disease’s spread. The conversation about implementing these measures has now evolved into a debate about when we might end them in order to mitigate the damage to the global economy during this pandemic. This debate is a new version of an old argument: the needs of the many (in this case, economic prosperity) versus the needs of the relative few (those vulnerable to the consequences of coronavirus).How do we thread this needle?

Photo by Gustavo Fring by Pexels.

Africa and Coronavirus - Will Lockdowns Work? | Think Global Health

Authored by Salma Abdalla and Sandro Galea

“Many countries in Africa are burdened by high rates of malnutrition, different types of pneumonia, widespread malaria, and a large number of people living with HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, or both. The prior existence of these endemic infectious diseases, coupled with an increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases, make for a population in many parts of Africa that is particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. In light of that fact, it is not surprising that several African governments have enacted national responses to the outbreak and responded swiftly to address the spread of the virus. A number of these responses, however, have mimicked lockdown measures currently in place in some European countries and North America. We worry that given the differences in context, even between African countries, lockdown approaches are unlikely to succeed in the region.”

Photo by Omotayo Tajudeen

The True Costs of the COVID-19 Pandemic | Scientific American

Authored by Nasan Maani and Sandro Galea.

“The scale and unequal distribution of this disruption to human life must give us pause. Such measures do not just cause economic disruption but are also acutely harmful to population health. Focusing only on the health harms associated with unemployment, loss of income, and the broad impact on mental health outcomes associated with traumatic events and social isolation can give us a sense of the tip of the iceberg.

Unemployment has long been associated with a significantly increased risk of death in general, particularly for low-skilled workers in the U.S.. The risk of heart disease, the leading cause of death in the U.S. at almost 650,000 deaths per year, has been shown to increase by 15–30 percent in men unemployed for more than 90 days. Among older workers, involuntary job loss can more than double the risk of stroke, which already claims 150,000 lives in the U.S. per year, as well as increase the likelihood of depressive symptoms that then persist for years. Such harms are likely exacerbated by concomitant longer term social isolation, which in of itself is associated with a 30 percent increase in mortality risk. Loneliness and social isolation have been associated with a 29 percent increase in risk of incident coronary heart disease and a 32 percent increase in risk of stroke. The scale of these elevated health risks is significant—comparable to that caused by taking up light smoking or becoming obese.”

Commonwealth's COVID-19 response leaves too many behind | CommonWealth Magazine

Authored by Carlene Pavlos, Sandro Galea, and Cheryl Bartlett

“We appreciate the immense challenges facing our state policymakers. What they – and we – face is unprecedented and overwhelming. There is no playbook. Assistance and leadership from the federal government has been limited, late, and inconsistent, at best.

Even as we recognize these challenges, we are disappointed that the state’s response does not embed equity at its heart. There is, as of now, far less than we should expect in the way of clear plans, guidance, or resources that are targeted to protecting communities that already experience marginalization.

Two weeks ago, we announced urgent policy recommendations from the Emergency Task Force on Coronavirus & Equity – recommendations supported now by more than 150 Massachusetts organizations – designed to ensure communities experiencing the effects of racism, poverty, and xenophobia aren’t put at even greater risk during the outbreak. There has been some progress on these recommendations, but none have been fully implemented.”

Coronavirus Made It Clear: Our Health System Needs More Compassion | Elemental

“It is worth noting that, while the science is fairly clear that an abrupt end to physical distancing would interfere with slowing this disease, the debate we are seeing has little to do with the science of this pandemic. If it did, it would be a conversation less about whether to end physical distancing and more about how to do it properly. And if the argument for resumed functioning was really all about the economy, advocates for an Easter revival would be less concerned about stock prices and more focused on the low-wage, often marginalized workers that this crisis has revealed to be the backbone of our collective fiscal health.”

Photo by Pixabay from Pexels

POV: Coronavirus is taking a toll on mental health | BU Today

All this can weigh on mental health. I have long argued that mental health is public health, and we should address mental health with the same level of care we apply to the health of our bodies. This is no less true during the challenge of COVID-19. As our community adjusts to the measures we have collectively adopted to mitigate the spread of the disease, it is important to prioritize mental health, even as we take steps to minimize the infectious threat.

Slowing the spread of COVID-19 the right way | Commonwealth Magazine

THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC is rapidly evolving. Massachusetts, like the rest of the world, is working to hone its response to this novel coronavirus. State residents have accepted physical distancing, work and school closures, and other measures necessary to slow this disease.

Yet for all our efforts to stop Covid-19, the difficult truth is that, in many ways, we opened the door to its spread. We did this by accepting the conditions that create health inequities.

Closing the Health Gap to Fight Coronavirus | U.S. News & World Report

In the near-term, maintaining economic stability is critically important, as we work to limit the spread of disease. Social distancing is key to slowing COVID-19, but many low-wage, hourly workers do not have the economic flexibility to work from home, even when their health is at stake. $1,000 would provide near-term support to allow some of these workers to feel more comfortable about engaging in social distancing, in these early months of the outbreak.